Neural networks and physical systems
Steve has now posted his closing statement. As usual, I’m reproducing it here for ease of reference. This is the final part of our debate. My thanks to Steve for an interesting and thought-provoking exchange.
What I wanted to achieve in this debate was to explain how what we call reasoning in humans can arise without any involvement of God. When we observe a human taking in information, interpreting it, and responding, do we need to involve a deity? I have shown why we don’t with a clear explanation of how the interaction of neurons in the human brain can give rise to what we call “reasoning”.
What I had to achieve to win the debate was far, far simpler. All I had to show was that an alternative to the Christian God would have fitted my opponent’s arguments just as well, so showing that the Christian God was not necessary.
I’ll do that now: Suppose, hypothetically, I assume that my opponent was correct in every respect including the trinitarian nature of the deity. However, as he has provided no justification for which trinity is necessary, other than it be somehow supernatural and universal, I’ll go for the Wyrd Sisters, the Norns of Norse mythology: the Fates. I claim this is far more compatible with the reality we observe, as there is no theodicy required. The Fates can be nasty. There - debate over. Actually, it is far simpler than that. Non-theistic dualism is logically consistent. Therefore, by definition, God is not necessary for dualism (“necessary” means required in all logically possible worlds). I could have dismissed your entire argument and won the debate in two sentences. But, that would not have given me the chance to investigate the nature of reasoning in physical systems, which I believe has been a truly fascinating subject to explore.
Source: Dominic Bnonn Tennant
Neural Engineering: Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems (Computational Neuroscience)
Book (A Bradford Book)
You might also like:
Short answer2001-06-13 12:10:13 by datamouse
An article in Rolling Stone (October 20, 1994) by Adam Miller called J. Philippe Rushton a 'professor of hate,' someone who 'takes money from an organization with a terrible past' (the Pioneer Fund, a foundation said to have an orientation toward eugenics). He is accused of being 'obsessed with intelligence and genetics' to the point of having 'racist' attitudes by Jeffrey Rosen and Charles Lane in The New Republic symposium on IQ (October 31, 1994). They single out Rushton for linking ethnocentricism to genetic factors; this in turn subjects him to the broad brush of being, along with Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray, 'Neo-Nazis' Newsweek (October 24, 1994). In The Chronicle of Higher Education (October 26, 1994) critiquing Herrnstein and Murray's The Bell Curve it is clear...
Machine Learning Specialist – London — Here Is The City
Solid understanding of the principles of Tick Data, Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks or similar. · Knowledge of machine learning an absolute plus. In Summary – We require ... Required for this is C++ / Matlab / R / S+ / with a Master's / MSc ...
Neurons and Networks: An Introduction to Behavioral Neuroscience, Second Edition
Book (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press)
Physical Models of Neural Networks
Book (World Scientific Pub Co Inc)
Biological Neural Networks: Hierarchical Concept of Brain Function